Professional Learning Strategy – The Good, Bad, and the Ugly

Published on 29 November 2025 at 19:41

The duration of professional learning and development is a continuous process.  By focusing on one area for growth or improvement, educators can ensure meaningful improvements gradually, verifying all new strategies are understood when implemented.  I think educators need to connect with their students, making sure communication is clear and understood by all, and just as importantly, be flexible.  All learners are individuals and can not learn at the same pace or be taught in the same way.  One scholarly activity for 25 learners just doesn’t work.  It never really did, we just didn’t know.  For the longest time we just kept teaching the old way, because it was assumed teaching the same way forever was a good thing.  It wasn’t, but only recently we’ve accepted the need for change.  Kahmann, Droop, and Lazonder (2022) found that professional‑development programs focused on differentiated instruction produced a medium-sized improvement in teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and instructional practices, especially when the PD was tied to a specific subject domain rather than being generic.   And then, technology came along and is making all kinds of improvements!   

 

Principles of Effective Professional Learning

 

The five principles of effective professional learning emphasize an ongoing process where educators continuously improve their skills to better support student learning. Professional learning extends far beyond one-time workshops; its goal is to create a continuous cycle of improvement for educators and, ultimately, for learners. Structured and sustained professional development allows teachers to gradually implement and refine new strategies, receive feedback, and apply learning in authentic contexts.

Research shows that faculty development programs in health higher education produce measurable improvements in teaching competence and skills, highlighting the value of structured, ongoing professional learning in clinical and medical education (Cotta et al., 2024). Furthermore, longitudinal programs that extend over multiple years can lead to sustained improvements in teaching practices, rather than temporary gains from one-off interventions (Lee et al., 2020).

 

Key components of effective professional learning include:

 

  • Collaboration – Educators learn best when working together to problem-solve, share best practices, and coach peers.
  • Experiential and action-based learning – Hands-on activities, simulations, and inquiry-based tasks support active engagement and reflection.
  • Professional reading and research – Staying current with literature and new methods strengthens evidence-based practice.
  • Mentoring and induction – Feedback and structured support, especially for new educators, are essential for growth.
  • Curriculum-focused approaches – Professional learning should reflect the instruction learners will receive, ensuring alignment between teaching and practice.

 

By embedding these principles within a sustained, content-specific professional learning framework, educators are better equipped to adapt to diverse learner needs and foster meaningful, long-term improvements in teaching and learning outcomes (Cotta et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2020).

 

Duration of Development

 

Implementing new ideas or even the process of faculty training takes time and unfortunately, there never seems to be enough time in education.   Workshops and structured learning sessions are beneficial, but it takes deliberate effort to translate new knowledge and strategies into clinical practice, patient care, and research projects.  The design of the fellowship experience is crucial. Fellows need protected time and structured pathways to apply new skills in patient care, research, and teaching. Professional development should be an ongoing process, seamlessly embedded in rotations and clinical practice, rather than confined to isolated workshops or scheduled learning blocks. 

Professional learning needs to feel like it’s ongoing and NOT something faculty educators feel like they must do on designated days and at certain times.

 

Ongoing Support

 

Hematology/oncology faculty educators benefit from a clear vision and a structured strategy for professional learning that aligns with the fellowship’s clinical, research, and teaching goals. Planning and communication should occur early in the academic year, providing faculty with time to develop, practice, and refine strategies that enhance fellows’ learning, patient care, and research outcomes.

 

All available opportunities, such as mentorship programs, simulation sessions, case conferences, and teaching workshops, should be clearly communicated so faculty understand how to engage and contribute effectively. Sharing successes, innovative practices, and effective strategies across the fellowship reinforces learning and fosters a culture of continuous improvement and collaboration.

 

Research shows that longitudinal faculty development programs, which combine formal training, mentorship, and co-teaching opportunities, support sustained growth in teaching competence and help build a culture of teaching within clinical programs (Burgess et al., 2019). Embedding ongoing support and structured professional learning into daily fellowship practice ensures that faculty can continuously improve while modeling best practices for fellows.

 

Initial Exposure

 

With blended learning models incorporating both synchronous and asynchronous sessions, faculty educators can engage in professional development activities that align with fellowship goals in clinical care, research, and teaching. Faculty are encouraged to innovate while working toward program objectives, experimenting with new approaches in supervision, case discussions, or research mentorship.  Regular meetings, whether brief check-ins or structured discussions, provide opportunities to connect with peers, share what strategies are effective, identify challenges, and determine next steps. Mentorship, co-teaching in clinical settings, and collaborative case reviews are just a few ways faculty can offer and receive support. Sharing articles, innovative teaching methods, and developing new initiatives allows faculty to continuously integrate fresh approaches into existing fellowship practices, ultimately enhancing both fellow learning and patient care.

 

Modeling

 

Being strategic with professional learning for faculty educators yields multiple benefits for both fellows and patient care. Faculty serve as models for clinical reasoning, teaching, and research mentorship, demonstrating innovative approaches that fellows can observe and apply in real-world clinical and research settings. Faculty who tailors their professional growth to areas that matter most, whether teaching complex cases, leading research projects, or integrating new technologies, tend to make the greatest impact on fellows’ development.

 

The first step is prioritizing the professional journey for faculty themselves: identifying actual needs and integrating professional learning opportunities into their daily workflow so it complements, rather than adds to, existing responsibilities. Embedding development into in-house sessions, departmental meetings, and virtual learning platforms allows faculty to practice new strategies in context. While workshops and one-day sessions can introduce ideas, true growth comes from designing a continuous, integrated system of professional learning that spans the entire fellowship, rather than relying on isolated events (Hess et al., 2021).

 

Content

 

My teaching and learning expectations differ significantly from those in primary or secondary education. I work with graduate medical learners, hematology/oncology fellows, whose professional development involves mastering complex clinical knowledge, procedural skills, research methodology, and patient-centered decision-making. While the learning environment differs from a traditional classroom, the fundamental principles of effective teaching remain the same.  Tahmasebi et al. (2025) found that structured, multidisciplinary oncology‐education programs significantly improve trainees’ knowledge and skills, underscoring the importance of a training environment tailored to a clinical fellowship rather than a standard classroom.

 

Several factors influence learning in the fellowship context, including:

  • Number of learners per rotation or inpatient team
  • Level of clinical or research experience
  • Frequency and duration of clinical, educational, and research sessions
  • Delivery format, including in-person rounds, simulation, chalk talks, traditional lectures or virtual modules
  • Physical environment, patient care context, and technology resources

 

These factors interact with the characteristics of both learners and faculty educators. Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, problem-solving, and reflective practice are essential skills for fellows. Just as in earlier stages of education, learners develop habits of self-directed learning, curiosity, resilience, and ethical decision-making.  These are skills that will guide them throughout their careers.

 

Faculty play a key role in modeling these skills, providing structured guidance, feedback, and mentorship that foster fellows’ confidence and competence. By emphasizing values, motivation, and lifelong learning, faculty ensure that the educational experiences in clinical rotations, research projects, and teaching opportunities leave a lasting impact, preparing fellows to provide high-quality patient care and pursue scholarly exploration throughout their careers.

 

Audience

 

The primary audience for this professional learning strategy includes hematology/oncology faculty educators and first, second, and third year fellows. Their professional development needs encompass:

 

  • Practical strategies for teaching complex clinical cases and procedural skills
  • Integration of technology into clinical and educational practice, including simulation, telehealth, and electronic medical record (EMR) tools
  • Structured mentorship and opportunities for peer feedback during clinical rotations
  • Guidance on effectively integrating research, education, and patient care

 

By equipping faculty and fellows with evidence-based strategies for teaching, clinical reasoning, and technology integration, this professional learning program aims to enhance both educational outcomes and patient care. Supporting this audience in achieving these competencies represents the most meaningful impact of the program, fostering a culture of excellence and continuous improvement within the fellowship.

Collaboration and effective modeling

 

Given that the learners are faculty educators and fellows, collaboration will be a central component of professional learning. Structured peer groups will focus on clinical teaching strategies, research projects, and patient care case reviews, providing opportunities for shared problem-solving, feedback, and reflective practice.

 

An online community of practice will support ongoing collaboration by allowing participants to share teaching resources, case studies, and technology tools across the fellowship. Interdisciplinary discussions with teams from pharmacy, pathology, and palliative care will be incorporated to promote integrated learning and a holistic approach to patient care.

 

By modeling effective teaching, clinical reasoning, and collaborative problem-solving, faculty not only enhance fellows’ learning experiences but also reinforce a culture of continuous professional growth, innovation, and interdisciplinary cooperation within the fellowship.

Self-Directed Learning

 

Self-directed learning (SDL) is essential for continuous professional growth, fostering motivation for new experiences, clinical skills, and research accomplishments. Fellows and faculty may discover clear paths to new learning goals through self-directed exploration, which in turn enhances a sense of purpose and supports the achievement of broader professional objectives.

 

A supportive learning environment is critical for successful SDL. This includes access to resources, mentorship, guidance, and engagement with peer communities and online networks. Faculty play a central role in facilitating SDL, providing feedback, modeling reflective practice, and guiding learners in goal-setting and skill acquisition (Sawatsky et al., 2018; Vasli & Asadiparvar-Masouleh, 2024)

 

For hematology/oncology faculty and fellows, becoming a self-directed learner involves:

  • Developing a personalized learning plan for ongoing clinical, educational, and research growth
  • Staying current with medical literature and emerging best practices
  • Enhancing skills in data management, analysis, and research methodology
  • Seeking mentorship and reflective guidance on clinical and ethical decision-making

 

By cultivating self-directed learning, fellows and faculty are empowered to take ownership of their professional development, continuously improving their clinical expertise, research skills, and teaching effectiveness within the fellowship program.

 

 


Required Links: 


Resources: 

Timeline for Implementing Professional Learning Strategy

FALL Semester

Spring Semester

Professional Learning Sessions (Slides)

Planning and Orientation 

Planning Ppt 1 Slide Deck Pptx
PowerPoint – 325.5 KB 52 downloads

Initial Exposure - Month 1 

Power Point 2 Slide Deck Month 1 Pptx
PowerPoint – 749.1 KB 38 downloads

Handouts/Articles: 

Resource / Document What it Offers / Why It’s Useful File
Common Program Requirements (2025) — Faculty Responsibilities & Faculty Development Section Specifies that faculty must engage in structured faculty development annually (as educators, evaluators, in QI/patient safety, well‑being, and practice‑based learning/improvement). This aligns directly with your plan’s emphasis on ongoing support, structured PL, and embedding PD into clinical/research work. (ACGME) https://prod2.acgme-i.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/2025-reformatted-requirements/cprresidency_2025_reformatted.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Milestones & Competency Based Education Framework (Core Competencies and Milestones) The core competencies of ACGME (Patient Care; Medical Knowledge; Interpersonal & Communication; Practice Based Learning & Improvement; Professionalism; Systems Based Practice) provide a ready made framework for defining goals, assessing fellows and linking your PL plan to fellowship accreditation standards. (American College of Cardiology) https://www.acc.org/Education-and-Meetings/Products-and-Resources/Competencies/ACGME-Core-Competencies?utm_source=chatgpt.com
“Faculty Development in Medical Education” — CORD Handout A concise guide outlining why faculty development matters, core domains (teaching, facilitation, assessment, scholarship), and practical benefits for clinical-educators. Good as an orientation or handout for faculty/fellows. (Council of Residency Directors) https://www.cordem.org/siteassets/files/academic-assembly/2016-aa/handouts/best-practices/faculty-development-in-medical-education.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
“A Longitudinal Faculty Development Program: Supporting a Culture of Teaching” (2019) — BMC Medical Education Reports on a 1-year Clinical Teaching Fellowship program: design, implementation, evaluation. Excellent as a template or model for implementing a structured, long-term PD/training track. (SpringerLink) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12320991/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
“Twelve Tips to Deliver Large Scale Faculty Development in Health Professions Education” (2025) Offers actionable tips (“12 tips”) for rolling out broad faculty development initiatives — good for scaling up, implementation planning, and overcoming common barriers. (Taylor & Francis Online) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2407123?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Compilation 

 

Fellows, Fumbles, and Flourishing: My PL Reflection

This final unit on Professional Learning has been both challenging and illuminating. Designing a comprehensive professional learning (PL) plan pushed me to think deeply about what it truly means to foster growth, engagement, and competence among adult learners—particularly within the context of our Hematology/Oncology fellowship. One of the main challenges was balancing the ambitious scope of meaningful PL with the practical realities of clinical schedules, research responsibilities, and varying levels of prior experience among fellows. It made me confront how easy it is to create professional development that is “busy” without being truly impactful.

At the same time, this process forced me to stop and reflect on what makes learning stick. The emphasis on modeling, collaboration, active practice, and sustained support resonated strongly with my experience in fellowship education. Considering the five key principles of effective PL—duration, support, active learning, modeling, and discipline-specific relevance—highlighted how our fellowship could move beyond ad hoc teaching moments toward structured, longitudinal learning opportunities. For example, short, focused modules paired with co-teaching, reflective discussions, and hands-on application could provide fellows with both conceptual understanding and practical skills in patient care, research design, and professional judgment.

Perhaps the most valuable insight was recognizing the potential of a PL plan to cultivate a culture of shared growth. By positioning fellows as active participants and co-learners, while faculty model inquiry, problem-solving, and reflective practice, we create an environment where curiosity, risk-taking, and continuous improvement are not just encouraged—they are embedded in daily practice. Even with the challenges of coordinating schedules and resources, I can see how a thoughtfully designed PL framework could accelerate fellows’ development, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and ultimately improve both learning outcomes and patient care.

This class has not only provided tools and frameworks for planning professional learning but also inspired a shift in mindset: viewing PL not as a series of isolated sessions, but as an ongoing, collaborative journey that grows both educators and learners. Applying these lessons to our Heme/Onc fellowship holds great promise for cultivating skilled, reflective, and resilient clinicians who are prepared to thrive in complex, evolving healthcare environments.

 


References:

Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Mellis, C., & Roberts, C. (2019). A longitudinal faculty development program: Supporting a culture of teaching. BMC Medical Education, 19, 400. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1832-3

 

Cotta, R. M. M., de Souza Ferreira, E., de Aguiar Franco, F., et al. (2024). The effectiveness of faculty development programs for training university professors in the health area: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. BMC Medical Education, 24, 768. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05735-1

 

Hess, B. J., Pugno, P. A., Dreyfus, J., & McGinnis, J. M. (2021). Faculty development in academic hospital medicine: A scoping review. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 16(9), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3641

 

Kahmann, T., Droop, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2022). Meta‑analysis of professional development programs in differentiated instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102072

 

Lee, F. Y., Yang, Y. Y., Huang, C. C., et al. (2020). Sustained effects of faculty leadership development modules for clinical instructors of core competences education in Taiwan: A four‑year explanatory case study. BMC Medical Education, 20, 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02065-w

 

Tahmasebi, H., Ko, G., Lam, C. M., Bilgen, I., Freeman, Z., Varghese, R., Reel, E., Englesakis, M., & Cil, T. D. (2025). Multidisciplinary oncology education among postgraduate trainees: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e63655. https://doi.org/10.2196/63655

 

Vasli, P., & Asadiparvar-Masouleh, H. (2024). Self-directed learning and clinical competence: The mediating role of the clinical        learning environment. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 19(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.11.004

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.